Stem cell research a moral

Stem Cell Research at the Crossroads of Religion and Politics

So I like the word; but the reason I assign moral worth to the human embryo is that those emergent properties are already harnessed in the potential of that unfolding life. InJames Thomson and Jeffrey Jones derived the first human embryonic stem cells, with even greater potential for drug discovery and therapeutic transplantation.

It is the issue of our moral culture--that is, how we think about and seek to resolve moral issues. Hurlbut has also worked on astrobiology projects with NASA. Induced pluripotent stem cells may ultimately prove sufficient for these research and therapeutic ends, since the cells can a be selected for specific genetic mutations and b provide an exact genetic match for stem cell recipients.

This shows that not all persons can correctly assert that they began their life as a zygote. This entails the creation of embryos through in vitro fertilization. Since those who oppose creating embryos for research would likely maintain their opposition in the research embryo lottery case, it is arguably irrelevant whether embryos are viewed as potential children when they are created.

There are two arguments one might marshal against this presumption. Opponents of embryonic stem cell research object to two basic techniques: The phase when the baby could survive if born prematurely.

Utilitarianism flows from the naturalistic side of this worldview and compassion from its spiritualistic side. If you think of a living being as an integrated unit or complete system, ANT would break the system into subsets and study only a subsystem.

Similar sentiments have led the masses of our culture to embrace the use of embryonic stem cells for the greater good--out of a sense of compassion--precisely because there are no perceived providential renderings to order our lives.

One such form of complicity arises from an association with wrongdoing that symbolizes acquiescence in the wrongdoing Burtchaell Many, if not most, who support the use of human embryos for HESC research would likely agree with opponents of the research that there are some circumstances where the use of human embryos would display a lack of appropriate respect for human life, for example, were they to be offered for consumption to contestants in a reality TV competition or destroyed for the production of cosmetics.

But this is also true in the case of embryos created for reproductive purposes where patients are open to donating spare embryos to research. The Virtue of Compassion The second major approach to defending the use of human embryos for harvesting stem cells extols the virtue of compassion.

The embryo has full moral status from fertilization onwards Either the embryo is viewed as a person whilst it is still an embryo, or it is seen as a potential person. WH No, exactly the opposite. In the mids, for example, federal policymakers prohibited funding for so-called test tube babies, laying the groundwork for future discussions of whether the U.

Arguments for this view There are several stages of development that could be given increasing moral status: This objection faces two difficulties.

With regard to embryonic stem cell research, it assumes that embryonic stem cells will prove to have significant therapeutic value; however, this is still only a projection though not without some warrant given the animal research done thus far.

The Stem Cell Debate: Is it Over?

In AugustThe U. It is morally impermissible to intentionally kill innocent human beings; the human embryo is an innocent human being; therefore it is morally impermissible to intentionally kill the human embryo.

It needs external help to develop.

Stem Cell Research at the Crossroads of Religion and Politics

There is thus reason to doubt that there is a moral distinction between creating embryos for research and creating them for reproductive purposes, at least given current fertility clinic practices. Bush vetoed the bill. Compassion, conversely, brings its own meaning to the suffering situation in such a way that all else becomes secondary, for it appeals primarily to our emotions.

Some claim that we can reconcile the ascription of a right to life to all humans with the view that higher order mental capacities ground the right to life by distinguishing between two senses of mental capacities: The claim takes two different forms. Humans never develop their ethical norms in a vacuum, but always in relation to their understandings of transcendence and human nature, perspectives on what is fundamentally wrong in the world, beliefs about how that wrong should be rectified i.

For example, the research could provide important insights into the fundamental processes of gamete biology, assist in the understanding of genetic disorders, and provide otherwise infertile individuals a means of creating genetically related children.

In the midst of the debate over using embryonic stem cells in research, a more fundamental issue has often been overlooked. It is a reality that will not only affect the outcome of this debate, but of numerous moral quandaries in the days ahead. Stem-Cell Research: Setting the Moral Frame Dan Cloer William B.

Hurlbut is a medical doctor and a consulting professor at Stanford University Medical Center’s Neuroscience Institute in California. Stem-Cell Research: Setting the Moral Frame Dan Cloer William B. Hurlbut is a medical doctor and a consulting professor at Stanford University Medical Center’s Neuroscience Institute in California.

American Life League has amassed thousands of documents and articles on the full spectrum of life issues. We are also actively creating and promoting new media resources, bringing essential knowledge of the pro-life movement to a new generation.

Stem cell controversy

How to use this resource section: To the left of your screen, you’ll find educational topics related [ ]. Watch video · In the case of embryonic stem cell research, it is impossible to respect both moral obtain embryonic stem cells, the early embryo has to be destroyed.

Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research

This means destroying a potential human life. Until recently, the only way to get pluripotent stem cells for research was to remove the inner cell mass of an embryo and put it in a dish.

Stem-Cell Research: Setting the Moral Frame

The thought of destroying a human embryo can be unsettling, even if it is only five days old.

Stem cell research a moral
Rated 4/5 based on 35 review
The Stem Cell Debate: Is it Over?